same bellhousing?
Moderator: FORDification
-
- New Member
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 5:13 am
- Location: CANADA, Winnipeg
same bellhousing?
I have a 76 F100 with a 360 and C6 automatic transmission, which I am considering putting into my new 72. The 72 has a 302 with a 3 speed manual. I dont think they have the same bellhousing and are therefore not interchangable, but my dad thinks they are the same.......Who's right?
- FORDification
- Site & Forum Admin
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
- Location: Kansas, Wellsville
- Contact:
re: same bellhousing?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6e85/f6e85284dd0305d46b9623c03a63893fe8b9d253" alt="Yeah that :yt:"
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d591/9d591b7af6ab3b498e1742e04ed537435d675a3e" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f1d7/5f1d7ec35eb307244b4a4d4a480f25aa75571f4d" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9009/c9009fc858532fdeb593024f4802f7f0c276ea50" alt="Image"
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d591/9d591b7af6ab3b498e1742e04ed537435d675a3e" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f1d7/5f1d7ec35eb307244b4a4d4a480f25aa75571f4d" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9009/c9009fc858532fdeb593024f4802f7f0c276ea50" alt="Image"
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
-
- New Member
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 5:13 am
- Location: CANADA, Winnipeg
It's an option, but I'd like to save on fuel wherever i can. I'm just using this as a work truck to bring stuff home from home depot and trips to the dump and stuff like that. Gas is $1.03 per liter here, which works out to over $4.00 a gallon! I think I'm just going to keep the manual tranny with 302 in there if I can get the shifter linkages to work a little smoother. I find it fun with the three on the tree!
- 1970F250
- Preferred User
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:29 pm
- Location: California
- 72hiboy4x4
- Blue Oval Fanatic
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 8:53 pm
- Location: As far away as I can be from Wa state, without crossing the Mississippi
- Contact:
but the C6 robs you of about 10% of your HP thru slippage in the torque converter. I believe a manual tranny driven correctly will save fuel.
In life many men take the path of righteousness, some take the path many others follow (G.M. owners, for example), some take a more arduous path, some a simpler path. I, sir, took the PSYCO-PATH!!
- 1970F250
- Preferred User
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:29 pm
- Location: California
re: same bellhousing?
i didnt think of that
i was thinking how much i would be reving a truck with a manual tranny and all the gas it sucks at high rpms. i agree with you now. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba57e/ba57e9a74b97b1cc11b30acee8e5ea95143b3341" alt="Thumbs up :thup:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59145/59145d5479068f3a555ff0074c9cd13655bb5a22" alt="Embarassed :oops:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba57e/ba57e9a74b97b1cc11b30acee8e5ea95143b3341" alt="Thumbs up :thup:"
Steve
binder56jd wrote: If you can't dazzle them with diamonds- baffle them with b------t